Ideally, your wifis would be a screenshot from the device used to detect the wifis, upload the image same as the PO photos. I expect if you are unable to have screenshots (device incapability, etc) a photo of written notes may suffice, uploaded with the PO photo.
Just uploaded my city's PO. Work has me driving around to a couple bordering towns including Cincinnati this week so if I happen to pass any more up I'll be sure to snap some intel
I will continue to provide intel on Vienna post offices tomorrow. Today I conducted a secret meeting with a fellow agent currently on rehab and yet unbriefed. May be able to activate him, thus raising Vienna level to 4. Will report.
Milan is level 2 now, I just contacted friendly agent in the area, aiming at increasing defense level.
Hello Agents. I'm new to the forums. Anyone here in the Boston area? I got Somerville and Cambridge on the map today. I'm hoping there's other agents in the area that can get the levels up higher.
Status as of 2016-08-17 21:45 UTC Signal Strength Reported: 46.5% Death Toll Reported: 0404 deaths Global Network Status: Isolated Network : 90 Cities - 60% Localized Defense: 41 Cities - 27% District Wide Protection: 11 Cities - 7% City Wide Shield: 8 Cities - 5% Total: 150 Cities Spoiler: List of cities unlocked Aachen Level 1 Afton Level 1 Archibald Level 1 Au Sable Forks Level 1 Austin Level 1 Bakersfield Level 2 Baltimore Level 1 Barrie Level 2 Bastrop Level 1 Bay Shore Level 2 Belfast Level 1 Boise Level 3 Bojkovice Level 1 Boston Level 3 Bournemouth Level 2 Bratislava Level 1 Brest Level 1 Brisbane Level 1 Brooklyn Level 2 Budapest Level 3 Burlington Level 1 Cambridge Level 2 Carlsborg Level 1 Cartagena Level 2 Charlotte Level 1 Columbia Level 1 Copenhagen Level 1 Coulommiers Level 1 Culver City Level 1 Delano Level 1 Drama Level 2 Dresden Level 2 Dublin Level 1 Düsseldorf Level 1 Enköping Level 4 Essex Junction Level 2 Falkirk Level 1 Fort Mitchell Level 1 Fort Worth Level 1 Galway Level 1 Geelong Level 4 Giv'atayim Level 1 Glen Eira Level 1 Glenelg Level 2 Glenwood Level 1 Gliwice Level 2 Greentown Level 1 Hartville Level 1 Hasselt Level 2 Hellevoetsluis Level 2 High Wycombe Level 2 Hong Kong Level 3 Hudson Level 2 Istanbul Level 2 Kansas City Level 1 Karlstad Level 2 Keeseville Level 1 Kerrville Level 1 Kilkenny Level 2 Konstanz Level 1 L'Assomption Level 1 Lahti Level 2 Lakeland Level 1 Las Vegas Level 2 Leichlingen Level 1 Leiden Level 2 Lenexa Level 1 Leuven Level 1 Lévis Level 1 London Level 4 Los Angeles Level 4 Los Gatos Level 1 Lyon Level 2 Madrid Level 2 Mangham Level 1 Maple Ridge Level 1 McFarland Level 1 Melbourne Level 2 Miami Beach Level 1 Milan Level 2 Montpellier Level 2 Montreal Level 4 Morgan Hill Level 1 Moscow Level 4 Nantwich Level 1 Neath Level 1 Nevele Level 1 New York Level 3 Northampton Level 1 Northampton Level 2 North Canton Level 2 Oakland Level 2 Oirschot Level 1 Old Bethpage Level 1 Oslo Level 1 Ottawa Level 1 Oxford Level 2 Palma Level 2 Paris Level 3 Plainview Level 1 Pleasant Hill Level 1 Poole Level 1 Port Angeles Level 1 Portugalete Level 1 Rayville Level 1 Richmond Hill Level 1 Roseville Level 1 Saalfeld Level 1 Saginaw Level 1 Saginaw Level 1 Sainte-Foy Level 3 Salisbury Level 1 San Antoino Level 4 San Francisco Level 3 San Jose Level 3 Sarreguemines Level 2 Saskatoon Level 1 Schwabach Level 1 Seattle Level 4 Seguin Level 2 Sequim Level 1 Shawnee Mission Level 2 Sigulda Level 1 Singen Level 1 Slavičín Level 1 Smithtown Level 1 Somerville Level 2 South Point Level 1 Squamish Level 1 Stedman Level 1 Steinkjer Level 2 St. Gallen Level 2 St George Level 1 St. George Level 2 Stillwater Level 1 Stockholm Level 1 Sydney Level 2 The Hague Level 3 Toronto Level 3 Toulouse Level 1 Uniontown Level 1 Vancouver Level 1 Vaughan Level 1 Viana do Castelo Level 1 Vienna Level 2 Washington Level 1 Welland Level 1 Whistler Level 1 Wolfenbüttel Level 1 Yekaterinburg Level 1 I've been playing with the data we have available and I've come to an aproximation of the weight of each level. It's a rough aproximation but I think it could be useful to see how far we are from 100% and act accordingly. The aproximated weights are the following: Level 1 = 0.2 Level 2 = 0.4 Level 3 = 0.6 Level 4 = 0.8 Using this with the last known status the signal would be: 90x+41y+11z+8t = 47.4 (46.5+0.9) Spoiler: more info I have used the following equations: 6x+6y=4.5 40x+22y+5z+t=20.8 50x+23y+8z+3t=33.5 90x+41y+11z+8t=46.5 However, I'm only confident in the last one. I think the rest are not accurate. I'm also assuming that there is a linear relation between the weights. Following this hypothesis we could say that: 1 Level 4 node == 4 Level 1 nodes 1 Level 3 node == 3 Level 1 nodes 1 Level 2 node == 2 Level 1 nodesSo, in order to get to 100%: ~263 Level 1 nodes left ~132 Level 2 nodes left ~88 Level 3 nodes left ~66 Level 4 nodes left We have 2 days left so we must keep the momentum and do our best. Spoiler: *mad scientist mode off*
Anyone working on Cincinnati, OH? I am going to be uploading a P.O. later tonight. Hoping to increase defense level tomorrow.
I'm in the same position. I hit five small town post offices today, all with one post office each and only one of them had more than one wifi connection and all the connections were secure.
I added five small rural post offices today. Each was the only one in it's town. I may be able to do two or three more towns over the next day or two. Anyone else in northeast Louisiana? Maybe we could coordinate efforts.
Hey! Boston proper is level 3 right now (I believe with 4 submissions) so if you go find 4 post offices in Boston we'll have a city wide (aka level 4) city! Also I'm north of Boston but considered 'Boston area'.
I am going to probably get New Braunfels up to Level 2 as well as the surrounding cities. Hopefully that can help. Other agents that I know are going to be busy the rest of the week.
Updates Field Intelligence continues to pour in from agents all over the world. Here is a detailed report of our current Global Alert Network: Isolated Network : 101 Cities Localized Defense: 42 Cities District Wide Protection: 11 Cities City Wide Shield: 9 Cities The strength of the network has allowed us to intercept 33 contaminated letters today, greatly minimizing civilian casualties. Collections from the Global Alert Network nodes have been received and processed by NITE Team 4 systems. The data repository can be found here: NT4-AlertNet-17-08-2016.csv Instructions All agents must work to gather recon photos of post office branches along with screencaptures showing wifi networks to create a comprehensive monitoring system of the world’s postal systems. Important details of the field work, including safety directives, can be found here: Archive 6F4FA7 The Global Alert Network map will be updated as the network increases in strength.. A broader Global Alert Network will allow more infected letters to be detected early and minimize casualties. We must reach maximum capacity no later than 00:00 UTC on 08/20/16. Monitor the IRC, our Forums and the Div 66 Twitter for further details. EDIT: GDOC LINK FOR THOSE WITHOUT EXCEL! https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/143eHzE7Hs2WXOb_Kcm75q5iYbGCmeMlRUc3zblfL8jo/edit?usp=sharing Mod edit: Links removed due to Mailchimp data.
Thing to note regarding the message. The full ASCII to Hex returned "v:Carcosa". Anyone have any idea what "v:" might signify?
Just throwing some random infos I found out while looking at the CSV file... (I don't know if someone already checked it out, so forgive me if the info is already "out there"!) Out of the 124829-ish lines that contain what seems to be MAC addresses, only 4 of them seem to be repeated multiple times... - 78:fb:d9:6a:9d:ea , all in Geelon. (Which is where "that letter" got detected) : 8 times for PostalNode-ID1 to 8 - 88:c5:48:65:55:45, all in San Antonio. : 8 times for PostalNode-ID1 to 8 - d9:e0:2e:a9:eb:05, all in The Hague. : 5 times for PostalNode-ID1 to 5 - fc:b8:fe:ca:8d:de, all in Hong Kong. : 5 times for PostalNode-ID1 to 5 Wonder if it could mean anything?
